When I came across the idea of a truth in advertising, I began to realize that my reviews of various products might fit into such a realm and discussion. If a person has no desire or claim to self another a service or a particular product, it remains that the former person can give a truly honest and open review. This is the manner on which I have given reviews, in particular of fitness supplements.

Though given such a foundation, what can be said or expected on the manner of income for these reviewers? Can it be justified, or perhaps expected, that reviewers can be paid and remain unbiased? What if these reviewers are paid by a third party that claims or accepts no directly derived outcomes? Suppose makers of any products are only paying for access and time, and not for any particular review. That manner of contract would allow for openness and honesty, in particular if the speech of the contract demanded complete and total transparency and accepted the occasion of a negative review.

Yes, such a particular situation can be created and should allowed to exist. My reviews are of this manner, even when products have been provided with no expense on mine part. Several manufactures have sent me products to review. Not once was there an expectation the review be unforthrightly positive.

With the Universe as a witness, it is hereby declared upon the Creation of Thought and Reason, a company shall arise, a Commercial and Advertising company at that, which will provide the Resources required to interview and create the content upon which reviews and interviews can be justified to supplement manufactures. Yes, honest and complete openness.

My various supplement and fitness videos are well documented to be without purchase and influence. It is time for the advertising company that wishes to promote these such arise.